{"id":4316,"date":"2023-03-21T14:00:00","date_gmt":"2023-03-21T14:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/patsytrench.com\/?p=4316"},"modified":"2023-12-13T12:25:36","modified_gmt":"2023-12-13T12:25:36","slug":"how-to-get-what-you-want","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/patsytrench.com\/2023\/03\/21\/how-to-get-what-you-want\/","title":{"rendered":"How to get what you want"},"content":{"rendered":"\n

The secret to successful protest<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

The more I research the past the more I find parallels with the present.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The women\u2019s suffrage movement in Great Britain comprised several different organisations, each of them with slightly different aims and with very different approaches. The  two largest, the NUWSS (The National Union of Women\u2019s Suffrage Societies), founded by Millicent Fawcett, was a peaceful movement whose members were referred to as suffragists. The WSPU (The Women\u2019s Social and Political Union), founded and run on authoritarian grounds by Emmeline Pankhurst and her daughters, espoused \u2018direct action\u2019 which included on occasion storming the Houses of Parliament and vandalising buildings. This in turn spawned a breakaway group called the Women\u2019s Freedom League, who disapproved of the dictatorial way the WSPU was run.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Confused? I certainly am. Although the different organisations did cooperate on occasion it can\u2019t have helped their cause to be so split in their aims and their methods.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

https:\/\/www.bl.uk\/votes-for-women\/articles\/suffragists-and-suffragettes<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Reading about the the suffragettes I am reminded of Extinction Rebellion, aka XR, a British-founded global environmental organisation, well-known for their disruptive tactics such as blocking bridges and roads in central London and on one occasion gluing themselves to underground trains in order to draw attention to our climate emergency.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In both cases their more extreme methods, whatever you may think of them, were a direct result of years of being ignored. Mrs Fawcett\u2019s suffragists had been lobbying parliament for decades, with very little result. XR came to the fore a few years ago when they imported a boat into Oxford Circus and reminded us of the urgency of climate change. Both attracted the attention of the media, not always positively. Both divided public opinion. Both had MPs effectively demolishing their arguments by condemning their methods.<\/p>\n\n\n

\n
\"\"
XR and The Boat (The Telegraph)<\/figcaption><\/figure><\/div>\n\n\n

(Winston Churchill, then President of the Board of Trade, like a more recent MP and Prime Minister, seemed to change his mind about women\u2019s suffrage according to who he was talking to at the time. At one point he told the suffragettes he was their \u2018friend\u2019, and then declared women would never get the vote until they ceased their militant tactics; to which those women might have responded \u2018If you really were our friend you\u2019d have done something to help us and we wouldn\u2019t have needed to resort to those tactics\u2019.)<\/p>\n\n\n\n

So how do we, the protesting general public, achieve our aims? Public opinion, led by the media, is one thing; a peaceful demonstration is unlikely to attract media attention unless someone metaphorically or physically throws the odd stone. In 1908 a quarter of a million suffragettes and supporters held a peaceful rally in Hyde Park, to no avail. In 2003 a million people, including yours truly, marched through central London protesting against the impending war in Iraq, to no avail.<\/p>\n\n\n\n